Sex dating online sveeige

Discrpencys in online dating

20 Dating Is the New Dating Site for Extreme Age Gaps,Recommended for you

 · Credit: CC0 Public Domain. A new study from the University of Kansas shows that in "hookup culture,"—in which young people may engage in sex without the traditional courtship Online dating data shows both men and women sometimes pursue relationships with partners up to 25 percent more attractive. But such relationships may not necessarily be doomed. Results  · Typically, my stance on the “niche” online dating platforms that continue to pop up relentlessly in this, the year , has been a skeptical blogger.comr, the recent launch of 20  · A large, nationally representative survey and audit conducted by eHarmony predicted that by , 70% of relationships will begin online [ 6 ]. With SBDA use increasing The present study used a sample of 8, dating couples from the United States to explore how sexual desire discrepancy was associated with relationship satisfaction and stability. Sexual ... read more

Sign up for InsideHook to get our best content delivered to your inbox every weekday. And awesome. Popular at InsideHook. Travel Airlines Are Cracking Down on Carry-Ons, So Watch Your Bags. Chicago Los Angeles Miami New New York. San Francisco Texas Washington DC.

The Goods Deals Subscribe Account. The app for people who love an eyebrow raising age gap. facebook twitter pinterest linkedin Send to Friend. More Like This. A New Dating App for Tesla Owners Is in the Works. Dinky One Is a New Dating Site for People With Small Penises. How to Date a Younger Woman Without Being the Worst. Is This the End of "Daddy" Culture? Recommended Suggested for you.

Airlines Are Cracking Down on Carry-Ons, So Watch Your Bags. In fact, the front page of Connect. The structure of the search parameters encouraged some to alter information to fit into a wider range of search parameters, a circumvention behavior that guaranteed a wider audience for their profile. Many of our participants recounted cases in which others freely and without embarrassment admitted that they had slightly misrepresented something in their profile, typically very early in the correspondence:.

For instance, one participant who misrepresented his age on his profile noted:. On the other hand, if I put X number of years, that is unattractive to certain people. So if I say I am 44, people think that I am It blows. RealSweetheart, Bay Area Male. In the above cases, users engaged in misrepresentation triggered by the social norms of the environment and the structure of the search filters. The technical constraints of the site may have initiated a more subtle form of misrepresentation when participants were required to choose among a limited set of options, none of which described them sufficiently.

In addition to the cases in which misrepresentation was triggered by technical constraints or the tendency to present an idealized self, participants described a third branch of unintentional misrepresentation triggered by the limits of self-knowledge. People like to write about themselves. This is how they really see themselves. KarieK, Bay Area Female.

In explaining this phenomenon, KarieK used the metaphor of a mirror to emphasize the self-reflexive nature of the profile. The difference might be overly positive which was typically the case or negative, as the below example illustrates. A male participant explained:.

So I then widened my scope [in terms of search parameters] and would go off the photographs. In their profiles and online interactions, they attempted to present a vision of self that was attractive, engaging, and worthy of pursuit, but realistic and honest enough that subsequent face-to-face meetings were not unpleasant or surprising. The increased ability to engage in selective self-presentation, and the absence of visual cues in the online environment, meant that accuracy of self-presentation was a salient issue for our interviewees.

In an environment in which there were limited outside confirmatory resources to draw upon, participants developed a set of rules for assessing others while incorporating these codes into their own self-presentational messages.

For example, one participant made sure that her profile photograph showed her standing up because she felt that sitting or leaning poses were a camouflage technique used by heavier people. This illustrates the recursive way in which participants developed rules for assessing others e. Profile photographs communicated not only what people looked like or claimed to look like , but also indicated the qualities they felt were important.

For instance, one man with a doctorate included one photo of himself standing against a wall displaying his diplomas and another of him shirtless.

When asked about his choice of photos, he explained that he selected the shirtless photo because he was proud of being in shape and wanted to show it off.

To summarize, our data suggest that participants were cognizant of the online setting and its association with deceptive communication practices, and therefore worked to present themselves as credible. In doing so, they drew upon the rules they had developed for assessing others and turned these practices into guidelines for their own self-presentational messages.

The primary goal of the online dating participants interviewed for this study was to find someone with whom they could establish a dating relationship although desired commitment level and type of relationship varied across participants.

Given this, they attempted to achieve their goals while contending with the unique characteristics of the online environment, engaging in strategies designed to circumvent the constraints of the online dating environment while exploiting its capacities. One constraint—the lack of nonverbal cues—meant that the task of interpreting the remaining cues became paramount in regards to both assessment of others and presentation of self.

Since the goal of most online dating participants was to identify and interact with potential romantic partners, individuals strove to highlight their positive attributes and capitalize on the greater perceived control over self-presentation inherent in the medium. However, the future face-to-face interaction they anticipated meant that individuals had to balance their desire for self-promotion with their need for accurate self-presentation.

In response to the risk of misrepresentation online, made possible by the selective self-presentation affordances of CMC, participants adopted various strategies to demonstrate the credibility of their identity claims, recursively applying the same techniques they employed to uncover representational ruses in others.

Our findings suggest that participants consistently engaged in creative workarounds circumvention strategies as they went through the process of posting a profile, selecting individuals to contact, and communicating with potential romantic partners. Our data also highlight the recursive process by which some participants constructed rules of thumb for assessing others e. Previous laboratory studies of SIP have tended to focus on the manipulation of a subset of cues.

Exploring the question of whether participants created a playful or fantastical identity online Stone, ; Turkle, or were more open and honest Rubin, , we found that the online dating participants we spoke with claimed that they attempted to present an accurate self-representation online, a finding echoed in our survey data Gibbs et al.

This study highlights the fact that creating an accurate online representation of self in this context is a complex and evolving process in which participants attempt to attract desirable partners while contending with constraints such as those posed by technological design and the limits of self-knowledge. In some cases, the technical constraints of the site may have unintentionally enabled acts of misrepresentation, for instance when participants slightly altered information in situations in which they felt an arbitrary data point in age, for example would significantly harm their chances of being discovered by a potential mate.

Additionally, self-reported descriptions that use subjective terms e. In the case of online dating, it may be that the default settings in the search field i. The ideal self refers to qualities or achievements one strives to possess in the future Bargh et al. In the realm of online dating, it is interesting that participants reported using the profile to ideate a version of self they desired to experience in the future.

For some, the act of constructing an online profile may begin a process of self-growth as they strive to close the gap between actual and ideal self, such as the woman who misrepresented her weight but then was able to achieve her goal of weight loss over time. Future research is needed to assess the extent to which this phenomenon exists and its long-term consequences for processes of self-growth. More research is also needed to understand fully whether strategies designed to circumvent constraints technical or other are perceived to be deceptive by users and, if so, which norms govern their use.

Future research could work to develop a taxonomy of online deception and acceptability, which takes into account the nuances of social norms and the fact that some misrepresentation may be unintentional or socially accepted. Given that deceptive practices are a concern for online dating participants, future research should explore the ways in which online dating sites could implement design features aimed at addressing these issues. A second design consideration is the possibility that the technical characteristics of some online dating sites may privilege objective characteristics such as demographic features and de-emphasize the process of seeing others as individuals rather than as amalgams of various traits.

The benefit, or capacity, of online dating is that participants can use specific search parameters to cull a subset of profiles from a larger database. Participants acknowledged that the online dating environment placed more emphasis on certain kinds of information—information that might not be very important in a face-to-face setting when chemistry was already established. To compensate for or to circumvent these constraints, participants tried to create profiles that stood out or evidenced aspects of self that they were particularly proud of rather than a laundry list of features.

They struggled to present themselves as unique individuals within the constraints of a technical system that encouraged homogeneity, negotiating a desire to stand out with the need to blend in. Future research might examine the potential for developing self-presentation tools that allow individuals more nuanced ways of expressing themselves in the online environment, such as video presentations, more sophisticated communication tools, or triangulated information from others on the site.

We chose to conduct interviews with online dating participants in order to gain insight into how they perceived their experiences and the processes through which they learned to avoid the pitfalls and exploit the possibilities of online dating.

However, there are several limitations that should be acknowledged in our method and sample. Limitations of this study include the sampling of only participants located on the West Coast.

While Connect. com members are worldwide, we cannot assess if regional or national differences affect the online dating experience. A major limitation is the potential for self-selection bias, as participants volunteered for the study. While demographically diverse, those that chose to volunteer might be biased toward a more positive outlook on online dating or potentially more honest in their online dating practices. In addition, the self-reported nature of the data may have resulted in a social desirability bias, making participants less likely to admit to intentional misrepresentation.

Finally, many of our findings may be specific to Connect. Future research could assess whether variables like self-efficacy predict which model users choose to utilize. Although our observations in this article were based on the sample as a whole, we acknowledge that there may be differences for instance, along gender lines which are beyond the scope of this article but which could be explored in future research.

From a historical perspective, the goals of online dating participants are not that different from those described by poets throughout the ages. What is different is the tools in their repertoire and the constraints and opportunities they present.

This study has attempted to elucidate and explain some of these social practices as a window into the ways in which new communication technologies are shaping us—and we are shaping them—in the ongoing pursuit of romantic relationships.

Prior CMC research has identified similar processes in interpersonal contexts. All identifying information about our participants has been changed to protect their confidentiality, although we have attempted to use pseudonyms that reflect the tone and spirit of their chosen screen names. Ahuvia , A. Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review.

Google Scholar. Baertlein , L. Demand for advice to online lovelorn is booming. Baker , A. What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met in cyberspace. Bargh , J. Can you see the real me? Journal of Social Issues , 58 1 , 33 — Berger , C. Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding and development of interpersonal relationships. Clair Eds. Baltimore: University Park Press. Google Preview. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication.

Human Communication Research , 1 2 , 99 — Berger , P. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Irvington Publishers. Bowker , N. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 8 2.

Brym , R. Love Online: A Report on Digital Dating in Canada. Buller , D. Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. Wiemann Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. CBC News. Online Dating Facts and Figures. Coffey , A. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cornwell , B. Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs.

Computers in Human Behavior , 17 2 , — DePaulo , B. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 70 5 , — Derlega , V. Self-disclosure and relationship development: An attributional analysis. Miller Eds. Dominick , J. Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly , 76 4 , — Donath , J. Identity and deception in the virtual community.

Kollock Eds. New York: Routledge. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal , 22 4 , 71 — Donn , J. Attitudes and practices regarding the formation of romantic relationships on the Internet. Dutton , W. Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities.

Oxford: Oxford University Press. Egan , J. Love in the time of no time. The New York Times. Eisenhardt , K. Building theories from case study research.

Academy of Management Review , 14 4 , — Fernandez , S. Getting to know you: Tell-all sites put online dater profiles to truth test. The Washington Post. Fiore , A. Online Personals: An Overview. Paper presented at the meeting of ACM Computer-Human Interaction , Vienna, Austria.

Gershberg , M. Funny odds of online dating. Gibbs , J. Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research , 33 2 , 1 — Glaser , B.

The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing. Goffman , E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor. Greene , K. Self-disclosure in personal relationships. Perlman Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Greenspan , R. Socializing surfers shop for friends, dates.

Hancock , J. Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. Tscheligi Eds. New York: ACM. Higgins , E. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review , 94 3 , — Hitsch , G. What makes you click: An empirical analysis of online dating Working Paper.

Howard , P. This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. share this! Home Other Sciences Social Sciences.

Credit: CC0 Public Domain. Explore further. DOI: Provided by University of Kansas. This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. Beads show European trade in African interior used Indigenous routes 6 hours ago. Relevant PhysicsForums posts Doubts about Franck-Condon principle Aug 11, Can I move a macro object at a very small distance around 10 nm?

Aug 11, Best Music Ever Aug 11, Wordle NYT Aug 11, When and why does an electron emit a photon? Regarding when to consider both laminar and turbulent flow Aug 11, Related Stories. Tailoring affects people's perceptions of dates suggested by online dating apps Oct 20, Nov 17, Jul 25, Dating hesitancy: Why people might not jump into a new relationship this winter Dec 16, Nov 05, Dec 10, Recommended for you. Research shows constituents ask female legislators to do more 8 hours ago.

Sep 15,

BMC Psychology volume 8 , Article number: 22 Cite this article. Metrics details. There is a lack of research into the relationship between SBDAs and mental health outcomes.

The aim of this study was to study whether adult SBDA users report higher levels of psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and lower self-esteem, compared to people who do not use SBDAs. A cross-sectional online survey was completed by participants. Mental health MH outcomes included the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-2 scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-2, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.

Logistic regressions were used to estimate odds ratios of having a MH condition. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used with an apriori model which considered all four mental health scores together in a single analysis.

The apriori model included user status, age and gender. Thirty percent were current SBDA users. The majority of users and past users had met people face-to-face, with More participants reported a positive impact on self-esteem as a result of SBDA use SBDA use is common and users report higher levels of depression, anxiety and distress compared to those who do not use the applications.

Further studies are needed to determine causality and investigate specific patterns of SBDA use that are detrimental to mental health. Peer Review reports.

Swipe-Based Dating Applications SBDAs provide a platform for individuals to interact and form romantic or sexual connections before meeting face-to-face.

SBDAs differ from other online dating platforms based on the feature of swiping on a mobile screen. Each user has a profile which other users can approve or reject by swiping the screen to the right or the left.

Other differentiating characteristics include brief, image-dominated profiles and the incorporation of geolocation, facilitating user matches within a set geographical radius. There are a variety of SBDAs which follow this concept, such as Tinder, Bumble, Happn, and OkCupid. The Australian population of SBDA users is rapidly growing.

In , Tinder was the most popular mobile dating app in Australia, with approximately 57 million users worldwide [ 1 , 2 ].

The role of SBDAs in formation of long term relationships is already significant and also rising; a survey of 14, recently married or engaged individuals in the United States found that almost one in five had met their partner via online dating [ 5 ].

With SBDA use increasing at such a rapid rate, investigation into the health implications of these applications is warranted. Such research has to date focused on investigating the link between these applications and high-risk sexual behaviour, particularly in men who have sex with men [ 7 ]. Currently, there is a paucity of research into the health impacts of SBDAs, especially with regards to mental health [ 8 ].

However, mental health refers not only to the absence of mental illness, but to a state of wellbeing, characterised by productivity, appropriate coping and social contribution [ 12 ].

Therefore, while mental illness presents a significant public health burden and must be considered when investigating the health impacts of social and lifestyle factors, such as SBDA use, a broader view of implications for psychological wellbeing must also be considered.

A few studies have investigated the psychological impact of dating applications, assessing the relationship between Tinder use, self-esteem, body image and weight management. On the other hand, Rönnestad found only a weak relationship between increased intensity of Tinder use and decreased self-esteem; however this may be explained by the low intensity of use in this study.

Correlations were 0. A study by Tran et al. of almost adults found that dating application users were significantly more likely to engage in unhealthy weight control behaviours such as laxative use, self-induced vomiting and use of anabolic steroids compared to non-users [ 14 ]. To our knowledge, there have been no studies investigating the association between SBDA use and mood-based mental health outcomes, such as psychological distress or features of anxiety and depression.

However, there have been studies investigating the relationship between mental health outcomes and social media use. To date, research into the psychological impact of social media has yielded conflicting evidence. One study found a significant, dose-response association of increased frequency of social media use with measures such as time per day and site visits per week with increased likelihood of depression [ 15 ].

Contrarily, Primack et al. found the use of multiple social media platforms to be associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety independent of the total amount of time spent of social media [ 16 ]. However, some studies found no association between social media use and poorer mental health outcomes, such as suicidal ideation [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].

found that while Instagram use did not directly impact user self-esteem, engaging in social comparison and validation-seeking via Instagram did negatively impact self-esteem [ 22 ]. A meta-analysis by Yoon et al. found a significant association between total time spent on social media and frequency of use with higher levels of depression [ 23 ]. This analysis also found that social comparisons made on social media had a greater relationship with depression levels than the overall level of use [ 23 ], providing a possible mediator of effect of social media on mental health, and one that may be present in SBDAs as well.

Existing research on the connection between social media use and mental health outcomes suggests that the way these applications and websites are used to compare [ 22 , 23 ]; to seek validation [ 22 ]; with additive components [ 20 , 21 ] is more significant than the frequency or time spent doing so.

This validation-seeking is also seen in SBDAs. Furthermore, Sumter et al. This, combined with the emphasis placed on user images in SBDA [ 25 ], enhances the sexual objectification in these applications. The objectification theory suggests that such sexual objectification leads to internalisation of cultural standards of attractiveness and self-objectification, which in turn promotes body shame and prevents motivational states crucial to psychological wellbeing [ 8 , 26 ].

The pursuit of external peer validation seen in both social media and SBDAs, which may be implicated in poorer mental health outcomes associated with social media use, may also lead to poorer mental health in SBDA users.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Swipe-Based Dating Applications SBDAs and mental health outcomes by examining whether SBDA users over the age of 18 report higher levels of psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and lower self-esteem, compared to people who do not use SBDAs.

Based on the similarities between social media and SBDAs, particularly the exposure to peer validation and rejection, we hypothesised that there would be similarities between the mental health implications of their use. As the pursuit of validation has already been found to be a motivator in Tinder use [ 24 ], and implicated in the adverse mental health impacts of social media [ 22 ], we hypothesised that SBDA users would experience poorer mental health compared to people who did not use SBDAs, reflected in increased psychological distress, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and lower self-esteem.

A cross sectional survey was conducted online using convenience sampling over a 3 month period between August and October Participants were recruited largely online via social media, including Facebook and Instagram. A link to the survey was also disseminated by academic organisations and the Positive Adolescent Sexual Health Consortium. The survey was also disseminated via personal social networks, such as personal social media pages.

The survey was created online using the secure Qualtrics software version Aug-Oct Qualtrics, Provo, Utah. Demographic factors, dating application factors and mental health outcomes were measured.

The questionnaire also included basic information on SBDA usage. Initially respondents were asked if they were current users, past users or non-users. Past users were those who had not used an SBDA in the last 6 months. The survey included frequency of SBDA use and duration of use.

Respondents were also asked the number of people they met in person from SBDAs, the number of serious relationships with people they met on SBDAs and if they met their current partner on an SBDA. Self-reported impact of SBDAs on self-esteem was assessed using a five-point scale from very negatively to very positively.

Due to small numbers in the extreme categories this variable was simplified to positively, no impact and negatively. Past users and non-users were asked their reason for not using SBDAs and what other methods they used to meet potential partners.

The outcome measures included psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and self-esteem. In line with the Australian Bureau of Statistics [ 27 ], psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale K6.

The K6 has six questions asking the frequency of various symptoms, each with a score of 0—4 none, a little, some, most or all of the time. The total score is out of 24, with scores over 13 indicating distress. Validity was assessed and confirmed by using data from 14 countries and recommended that it can be used when brief measures are required [ 28 ]. Anxiety was measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-2 scale GAD This scale involves two questions asking how many days they have experienced symptoms of anxiety in the last 2 weeks.

Each question is scored from 0 to 3 not at all, several days, more than half the days, nearly everyday , resulting in a total out of six. A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of the international literature demonstrated that scores greater than or equal to three indicated anxiety [ 27 ].

Construct validity of the GAD-2 was confirmed by intercorrelations with demographic risk factors for depression and anxiety and other self-report scales in a German population [ 29 ]. Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 PHQ-2 , which has two questions asking how many days in the last 2 weeks they have experienced low mood or anhedonia. The scoring system is the same as the GAD Construct validity of the PHQ-2 was confirmed by intercorrelations with demographic risk factors for depression and anxiety and other self-report measures in a German population [ 29 ].

Finally, self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale RSES. All of these tools K6, GAD-2, PHQ-2, RSES are widely used and have demonstrated validity. The cut off scores were used to dichotomise the variables to assess for the presence of the particular mental health outcome psychological distress, anxiety, depression or low self-esteem. The cut off scores were provided by the relevant literature for each tool [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 31 ].

Descriptive statistics were calculated, using SPSS software V22 IBM, New York, USA , to describe the sample and outcome measures. The mental health MH outcomes were considered in two ways. Firstly, MH outcomes were considered as binary outcomes of not having or having psychological distress, anxiety, depression, or normal or low for self-esteem using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Secondly, the continuous scores for each of the MH outcomes were compared with using apps versus not using apps using profile analysis with a repeated measures analysis of variance RM ANOVA.

Profile analysis was chosen because it is commonly used when there are various measures of the same dependent variable. Univariable logistic regressions were used to estimate crude odds ratios to determine which factors are associated with having poorer mental health.

For the multivariable logistic regression, the mental health outcome measures were the dependent variable and user status was the variable of interest whilst being adjusted for age, gender and sexual orientation. The profile analysis considers mean levels of the four continuous MH outcomes within-subject factors together in the one analysis and provides an adjustment for the lack of independence of these measures.

This analysis was conducted to provide a different picture to that of simply measuring whether someone has a specific MH condition as the numbers were rather small. User status was the variable of interest. Age and gender were included in the apriori model for adjustment. This analysis provides an understanding of how user status is related to the magnitude of MH scores after adjusting for gender and age between-subject factors. The self-esteem outcome was reversed 30 minus score so that higher scores were indicative of worse MH outcomes.

Both the Wilks lambda and Greenhouse-Geiser results are presented as the sphericity assumption was not met. Ethics approval was granted by Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee H

Mate Value Discrepancy and Attachment Anxiety Predict the Perpetration of Digital Dating Abuse,Access options

The present study used a sample of 8, dating couples from the United States to explore how sexual desire discrepancy was associated with relationship satisfaction and stability. Sexual  · Typically, my stance on the “niche” online dating platforms that continue to pop up relentlessly in this, the year , has been a skeptical blogger.comr, the recent launch of 20  · Credit: CC0 Public Domain. A new study from the University of Kansas shows that in "hookup culture,"—in which young people may engage in sex without the traditional courtship In one study, 40% of the women randomized to receive first-trimester ultrasonography had their EDD adjusted because of a discrepancy of more than 5 days between ultrasound dating and  · A large, nationally representative survey and audit conducted by eHarmony predicted that by , 70% of relationships will begin online [ 6 ]. With SBDA use increasing Online dating data shows both men and women sometimes pursue relationships with partners up to 25 percent more attractive. But such relationships may not necessarily be doomed. Results ... read more

You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. Address: Dept. Furthermore, the cross-sectional design of the study precludes us from drawing any causative conclusions. Journal of Consumer Research , 30 3 , — Finally, self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale RSES. Journal of Communication , 46 1 , 80 — The Statistics At A Glance: The Mental Health Of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender And Intersex People In Australia [Internet].

The total score is out of 24, with scores over 13 indicating distress. Chichester, England: Wiley. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, McMillan D. Your Last Name required Please enter your last name.